Fix the wrong hash algo check and make it a case of the existing elif chain

This commit is contained in:
結城イヴ 2019-04-24 01:00:33 -04:00
parent a7e4575049
commit 95d69d7979

View file

@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import config
import random
from inspect import cleandoc
import hashlib
import itertools
from helpers.checks import check_if_staff
@ -202,6 +203,12 @@ class Verification(Cog):
hash_allow = [hashlib.new(self.hash_choice, name.encode('utf-8')).hexdigest()
for name in allowed_names]
# Detect if the user uses the wrong hash algorithm
for w in hashlib.algorithms_guaranteed - {self.hash_choice}:
for name in itertools.chain(allowed_names, close_names):
if hashlib.new(w, name.encode('utf-8')).hexdigest() in message.content.lower():
self.wrong_hash_algo = true
# I'm not even going to attempt to break those into lines jfc
if any(allow in mcl for allow in hash_allow):
await member.add_roles(success_role)
@ -216,10 +223,7 @@ class Verification(Cog):
elif rand_num == 44:
no_text = "\"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.\"\n-Albert Einstein"
await chan.send(f"{message.author.mention} {no_text}")
# Tell the user if they use the wrong hash algorithm
for w in hashlib.algorithms_guaranteed - {self.hash_choice}:
if hashlib.new(w, name.encode('utf-8')).hexdigest() in message.content.lower():
elif wrong_hash_algo == true:
await chan.send(f"{message.author.mention} :no_entry: Close, but not quite. Go back and re-read!")
@Cog.listener()